Who is Being Assessed or Evaluated?:
Informal groups, networks, colleagues
Teams
Instrument Type:
Self-report (e.g., survey, questionnaire, self-rating)
Source of Data:
Health care providers, staff
Notes for Data Sources:
1,194 physicians, nurses, receptionists, administrators, and ancillary therapists representing 120 different teams within a non-profit health system. Team size ranged from three to 39 members in inpatient and ambulatory health care settings.
Instrument Content:
Reported perceptions, experiences of working relationships, teamwork
Notes for Content:
The tool measures 4 subdomains:
- Cohesion
- Communication
- Roles and goals
- Team primacy
Instrument Length:
31 items; time requirements are not specified.
Item Format:
31 item 4-point agreement scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (4).
Scoring:
An overall score of team development is calculated by converting the raw scores to a 0-100 range using a Rasch model conversion. The team is also provided the distribution of scores within the team and the items with the greatest disagreement between members.
Access:
Open access (available on this website)
Notes on Access:
Item content also appears in journal article. Contact author to confirm access.
Start the Conversation
Every registered user can comment on website content.
Please login or register to comment