Using SBAR to communicate falls risk and management in inter-professional rehabilitation teams

National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education's picture
Submitted by National Center... on Dec 18, 2014 - 3:41pm CST

Resource Type: 
Journal Article

This study implemented and evaluated the adapted Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) tool for use on two inter-professional rehabilitation teams for the specific priority issue of falls prevention and management. SBAR has been widely studied in the literature, but rarely in the context of rehabilitation and beyond nurse-physician communication. In phase one, the adapted SBAR tool was implemented on twoteams with a high falls incidence over a six-month period. In phase two, process and outcome evaluations were conducted in a pre-post design comparing the impact of the intervention with changes in the rest of the hospital, including the perceptions of safety culture (as measured by the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture); effective team processes, using the Team Orientation Scale; and safety reporting, including fallsincidence, severity and near misses. This study suggests that the adapted SBAR tool was widely and effectively used by inter-professionalrehabilitation teams as part of a broader program of safety activities. Near-miss and severity of falls incidence trended downward but were inconclusive, likely due to a short time frame as well as the nature of rehabilitation, which pushes patients to the limit of their abilities. While SBARwas used in the context of falls prevention and management, it was also utilized it in a variety of other clinical and non-clinical situations such as transitions in care, as a debriefing tool and for conflict resolution. Staff found the tool useful in helping to communicate relevant and succinct information, and to "close the loop" by providing recommendations and accountabilities for action. Suggestions are provided to other organizations considering adopting the SBAR tool within their clinical settings, including the use of an implementation tool kit and video simulation for enhanced uptake.

Please note: The full text of this article is only available to those with subscription access to the Longwoods database. Contact your institutional library or the publisher for details.

Author(s): 
Angie Andreoli
Carol Fancott
Karima Velji
G. Ross Baker
Sherra Solway
Elaine Aimone
Gaétan Tardif
Collections: 
Outcomes-based Evaluation Tools
4