Interprofessional care in intensive care settings and the factors that impact it: Results from a scoping review of ethnographic studies

Scott Reeves's picture
Submitted by Scott Reeves on May 22, 2014 - 3:37pm CDT

Resource Type: 
Journal Article

At the heart of safe cultures are effective interactions within and between interprofessional teams. Critical care clinicians see severely ill patients who require coordinated interprofessional care. In this scoping review, we asked: "What do we know about processes, relationships, organizational and contextual factors that shape the ability of clinicians to deliver interprofessional care in adult ICUs?" Using the 5-stage process established by Levac et al. (2010), we reviewed 981 abstracts to identify ethnographic articles that shed light on interprofessional care in the intensive care unit. The quality of selected articles is assessed using best practices in ethnographic research; their main insights evaluated in light of an interprofessional framework developed by Reeves et al (Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care. San Francisco, CA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010). Overall, studies were of mixed quality, with an average (SD) score of 5.8 out of 10 (1.77). Insights into intensive care unit cultures include the importance of paying attention to workflow, the nefarious impact of hierarchical relationships, the mixed responses to protocols imposed from the top down, and a general undertheorization of sex and race. This review highlights several lessons for safe cultures and argues that more needs to be known about the context of critical care if quality and safety interventions are to succeed.

Please note: The full text of this article is only available to those with subscription access to Elsevier's ScienceDirect database. Contact your institutional library or the publisher for details.

Elise Paradis
Myles Leslie
Michael A. Gropper
Hanan J. Aboumatar
Simon Kitto
Scott Reeves