Piloting interprofessional education: Four English case studies
These case studies were commissioned in 2001 by the Department of Health with the understanding that their evaluated findings would be disseminated to ensure wider application. Three of the case studies concentrate on practice learning using different approaches, and the fourth on restructuring of all health and social care curricula to allow for integration. The juxtaposition of these different approaches enables comparisons between them.
Accessing Interprofessional Education
This bibliography lists sources in the English language and refers to interprofessional education (IPE) in health, social care and other fields with reference to collaborative practice and the improvement of care and safety. Those in Section One have been written since 2000 and can be accessed on the internet free of charge. Those in Section Two are books published since 2000 primarily or substantially dealing with or informing IPE brought to CAIPE's attention, known to me personally or reviewed in the Journal of Interprofessional Care.
Improving Primary Health Care Through Collaboration: Briefing 1- Current Knowledge About Interprofessional Teams in Canada
This briefing is the first in a series of four that aims to provide an analysis of the impact of inter-professional teams on the Canadian primary health care system.
Document Highlights
Improving Primary Health Care Through Collaboration: Briefing 2- Barriers to Successful Interprofessional Teams
This briefing is the second in a series of four that aims to provide an analysis of the impact of inter-professional teams on the Canadian primary health care system.
Countries with robust primary care systems have residents in better health at lower costs. One way to achieve a more robust primary health care system is to optimize the use of inter-professional primary care (IPC) teams. IPC teams can improve health outcomes for patients with chronic and complex conditions.
Improving Primary Health Care Through Collaboration: Briefing 3- Measuring the Missed Opportunity
This briefing is the third in a series of four that aims to provide an analysis of the impact of interprofessional teams on the Canadian primary health care system.
Recommendations for Action: Getting the Most out of Interprofessional Primary Health Care Teams
Over the past decade, there has been increased uptake of the interdisciplinary team model for delivering primary care services. However, so much more could be done.
AITCS: Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale
The Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS) is a 37 item inventory with 4 subscales: partnership, cooperation, coordination, and shared decision making. Authors concluded it was a valid and reliable instrument. They found it to load on 3 factors explaining 61.02% of the variance. Internal consistency reliability for each subscale ranged from 0.80 to 0.97, with an overall reliability of 0.98.
Transforming Interprofessional Partnerships: A New Framework for Nursing and Partnership-Based Health Care
Transforming Interprofessional Partnerships: A New Framework for Nursing and Partnership-Based Health Care
Safety Organizing Scale
The Safety Organizing Scale was developed by Vogus and Sutcliffe at Indiana University School of Nursing and IU school of Medicine. This is a tool that is robust , valid and reliable . We will be using the measuement tool with the NEPQR grant to cultivate IPCP enviroments both in Acute ACC and rural health clinic sites .
Validity and Reliability of the Safety Organizing Scale
Creighton University Office of Interprofessional Scholarship, Service and Education
Toolkit:
- Good/bad team videos
- Cases for analysis
- Team Comittment Form
- Interprofessional Team Reasoning Algorithm
